Sectors
Accelerate growth and deliver results faster
Your business needs to scale and become profitable quickly, without cutting corners or slowing down. And you need to mature operations and processes, without losing agility or your edge.
Technology companies are under constant pressure to grow quickly while maintaining operational efficiency and innovation. As organizations scale, processes, systems and teams become more complex, making it harder to preserve the agility that fueled early success. Wipfli helps you build the operational, financial and strategic foundation needed for sustainable growth so you can expand without losing momentum.
Whether you’re preparing for your next funding round, improving margins or planning for an exit, understanding your financial position is critical. Wipfli combines deep financial and industry expertise to help you strengthen controls and make informed decisions that support long-term value creation.
As technology companies grow, disconnected systems, inconsistent data and manual processes can slow decision-making and execution. Our industry-experienced technology specialists help you build stronger data ecosystems, optimize operations and implement solutions that support future growth.
Finding, developing and retaining the right talent remains one of the biggest barriers to growth for technology companies. Rapid expansion often creates leadership gaps, workforce strain and pressure on company culture. Wipfli helps organizations build high-performing teams while building the leadership, processes and workforce strategies needed to scale successfully.
Growth brings increased operational, regulatory and cybersecurity risks. Wipfli’s multi-disciplinary risk advisory services can help you strengthen internal controls, enhance cybersecurity and navigate compliance requirements for more confident growth.
Explore our services
Wipfli helps tech firms move fast today and prepare for tomorrow. We make it easier to focus on what matters, so that you can secure the next round of funding, build your team and grow. We don’t just pop in, drop a solution and then disappear. We move quickly to get you the results you need today, but we also take the time to build a long-term relationship with you to continually fuel your growth and value. Our deep knowledge of the technology industry means we can anticipate your needs to help you get to — and guide you through — your next inflection point.
Insights for technology leaders
ARTICLE
Revenue leakage in healthcare: How to find and prevent it
Healthcare organizations continue to face mounting financial pressure. Labor costs remain elevated, reimbursement uncertainty persists and leaders are expected to invest in technology, workforce, compliance and patient or resident experience — often with limited resources. In response, many organizations focus on growth initiatives. But before looking outside the org for growth, healthcare leaders should prioritize identifying and preventing revenue leakage that is damaging their bottom line. Whether revenue leakage stems from denied claims, underpayments, documentation gaps, billing inefficiencies, reimbursement opportunities, occupancy challenges or operational breakdowns, the result is the same: Financial performance suffers. For organizations operating on narrow margins, small inefficiencies can create significant financial impact over time. What is revenue leakage in healthcare? Revenue leakage occurs when an organization fails to collect all the money it is owed for services provided. These losses can occur at any point in the revenue cycle, from patient registration and eligibility verification to clinical documentation, billing, collections and payer reimbursement. Revenue leakage often results from multiple small breakdowns across departments and processes. A registration error, missed charge, coding issue, delayed claim submission or overlooked payer underpayment may seem minor on its own. Collectively, however, these issues can significantly reduce margins, delay cash flow and limit a healthcare provider’s ability to invest in patient care, technology and workforce needs. Revenue leakage goes beyond claim denials While claims denials are a significant form of revenue leakage, there are other causes of lost revenue, including: Underpayments Inaccurate coding Incomplete charge capture Staffing shortages that prevent services from being delivered Inefficient workflows Where does revenue leakage occur in healthcare? Many leaders assume financial performance challenges stem from a single issue. In reality, revenue leakage often occurs through a series of small breakdowns across clinical, operational and financial functions. Mistakes that can lead to revenue leakage include: Patient registration, eligibility and authorization Errors in patient registration and insurance information can lead to claim denials, delayed payments and lower reimbursement levels, creating avoidable revenue leakage throughout the revenue cycle. Clinical documentation, coding and charge capture Incomplete clinical documentation, coding inaccuracies and missed charges can prevent organizations from collecting all the money they are owed for services performed. Even small documentation and charge capture mistakes can result in underpayments, claim denials or missed reimbursement opportunities. These errors can contribute to significant revenue leakage over time while increasing compliance and audit risks. Claims and denials Claims that are denied or paid below expected reimbursement levels often require significant time and resources to investigate, appeal and resolve, reducing overall revenue and increasing administrative burden. Payer reimbursement and underpayments Organizations may fail to capture all available reimbursement due to overlooked payer requirements, incomplete charge capture, unclaimed supplemental payments or a lack of processes to identify and pursue eligible revenue opportunities. Billing, accounts receivable and collections Inefficient workflows, staffing constraints or process bottlenecks can slow claim submission and collections efforts, extending the revenue cycle and negatively impacting cash flow. Operational inefficiencies Poor workforce planning, underutilized staff or scheduling inefficiencies can increase labor costs while limiting productivity and operational performance. In senior living and post-acute care settings, delays in admissions, prolonged vacancy periods or barriers in the move-in process can reduce occupancy rates and result in lost revenue opportunities. Lack of visibility into operational performance When data is fragmented across departments or systems, leaders may struggle to identify emerging issues, track key performance indicators or understand the root causes of declining financial performance. Individually, these issues may appear manageable. Collectively, they can represent meaningful lost revenue and reduced financial flexibility. How can you identify leakage in healthcare? Revenue leakage occurs across multiple departments, not just financial. Because of that, organizations must conduct a comprehensive assessment of operational, clinical and revenue-cycle performance to identify where revenue is being lost. Healthcare organizations should evaluate: Claim denial trends: Analyze denial rates, denial reasons and appeal outcomes to identify recurring issues and process gaps. Registration and eligibility accuracy: Review patient registration errors, insurance verification processes and authorization compliance to uncover front-end breakdowns that lead to reimbursement challenges. Clinical documentation quality: Assess documentation completeness and accuracy to determine whether services are being fully supported for coding and reimbursement purposes. Coding and charge capture performance: Look for coding inconsistencies and mistakes and missed charges that may be reducing reimbursement. Payer reimbursement patterns: Compare expected and actual reimbursement amounts to identify underpayments or missed payment opportunities. Accounts receivable aging: Monitor aging receivables, collection timelines and outstanding balances that may indicate process inefficiencies. Operational and workforce metrics: Evaluate productivity, staffing utilization, scheduling patterns and workflow bottlenecks that may be contributing to financial inefficiencies. Occupancy and admissions performance: For senior living and post-acute organizations, review occupancy trends, move-in timelines and admission conversion rates to identify lost revenue opportunities. Key performance indicators (KPIs): Track metrics such as clean claim rates, days in accounts receivable, denial rates, net collection rates, case mix index and reimbursement per service line. Data visibility and reporting capabilities: Determine whether leadership has timely access to accurate, actionable information that supports informed decision-making. How can healthcare organizations prevent revenue leakage? The highest-performing healthcare organizations do more than recover lost revenue. They create systems that consistently protect revenue across operations. By focusing on these three high-impact areas, healthcare leaders can often uncover meaningful financial improvements while also strengthening long-term operational performance. 1. Strengthen the front-end processes that influence financial performance Financial outcomes are often determined long before payment is received. For hospitals and Federally Qualified Health Centers (FQHCs), this may include patient access, eligibility verification, documentation and coding processes. For senior living organizations, it may involve occupancy management, admissions workflows and resident billing practices. Regardless of the setting, breakdowns early in the process can create downstream financial challenges that are difficult and costly to correct later. To strengthen front-end processes, organizations should start by mapping key workflows from initial patient or resident contact through reimbursement. This can help identify bottlenecks, handoff issues and areas where errors commonly occur. Leaders should also establish standardized procedures for registration, insurance verification, authorizations, documentation and coding to improve consistency across departments. Regular staff training is equally important. Front-line employees often have a direct impact on revenue capture, yet they may not fully understand how documentation errors, missing information or workflow delays affect reimbursement. Ongoing education can help reduce mistakes and strengthen accountability. Organizations should also monitor performance metrics such as registration accuracy, clean claim rates, coding accuracy, authorization compliance and admission-to-service timelines. Tracking these indicators allows leaders to identify problems early and address issues before they result in denials or delayed payments. Organizations that establish clear processes, accountability and performance monitoring are better positioned to reduce downstream revenue loss. 2. Improve operational visibility and consistency Improved visibility and consistency allow organizations to identify issues earlier and make more informed decisions. However, many organizations struggle to identify where financial performance is being impacted because data is fragmented across departments. Leaders can improve operational visibility by: Breaking down departmental data silos: Finance, clinical, operational and administrative teams should have access to consistent data and clearly defined metrics that align with organizational goals. Developing dashboards: Gain real-time or near-real-time insight into key performance indicators with dashboards. Rather than reviewing financial results after issues occur, leaders can monitor trends such as denial rates, labor costs, occupancy levels, accounts receivable that are beyond the due date and productivity measures as they happen. Maintaining consistency: Establishing routine performance reviews, department scorecards and leadership reporting helps ensure issues are identified and addressed promptly. Cross-functional meetings that bring together operational and financial leaders can also improve collaboration and deepen understanding of how day-to-day decisions affect overall financial performance. Leaders should also focus on understanding how operational decisions influence financial outcomes. Workforce utilization, clinical productivity, documentation quality, reimbursement performance, occupancy trends and patient service utilization all contribute to overall margin performance. 3. Identify and recover missed revenue opportunities The back end of the financial process often reveals opportunities for improvement. Denials, underpayments, aging receivables, reimbursement variances, collection challenges or billing delays frequently point to broader process issues that can be corrected. Organizations should conduct regular reviews of denial trends, payer performance and reimbursement outcomes to identify patterns that may be limiting revenue collection. Rather than addressing individual denials one at a time, leaders should analyze root causes to determine whether recurring issues stem from documentation gaps, coding errors, authorization problems or workflow inefficiencies. In addition, finance and revenue cycle teams should periodically evaluate accounts receivable, payer contracts and collection processes to identify underpayments or reimbursement opportunities that may have been overlooked. For senior living organizations, this may also include reviewing occupancy trends, move-in conversion rates and resident billing processes to identify opportunities to improve financial performance. Technology and analytics tools can also play an important role by helping organizations identify anomalies, monitor trends and prioritize areas requiring attention. However, the greatest value often comes from combining data analysis with cross-departmental collaboration to address issues in underlying processes. Organizations that regularly review financial performance data and investigate root causes of revenue leakage are often able to recover revenue while strengthening future performance. How Wipfli can help Wipfli has a team of professionals dedicated to helping healthcare organizations achieve their financial goals. We can help your organization identify where it is leaking revenue and develop processes to prevent it. Start a conversation . Capitalize on revenue capture opportunities Learn more Webinar: Find hidden revenue without adding services or staff AI in healthcare finance: Practicality over hype, strategy over speculation 2026 healthcare industry outlook: Get ready for seismic disruption
ARTICLE
Automating your SOC 2? Here are 4 frequently asked questions in healthtech
Today, rigorous security requires automation for speed and scale. And in the compliance world, automation is making it more feasible than ever to track controls continuously and centralize complex security processes. As industries like healthtech face funding challenges and budget constraints, more organizations are introducing automation through governance, risk management and compliance (GRC) tools that implement and manage the controls required for SOC 2 reporting. These ready-to-go compliance tools promise a cost-effective path to meeting client and contractual requirements. While an automated “out-of-the-box” solution sounds good on the surface, misinformation abounds when it comes to what organizations truly need for SOC 2 compliance. So, let’s set the record straight. Here are some frequently asked questions about SOC 2 automation that clients have been bringing to our team at Wipfli: Q: I’m considering a pre-packaged SOC 2 offering. What should I expect? A: GRC tool can be a useful security companion for organizations with limited compliance resources or complex environments, systems and services. Depending on how it’s configured and integrated across systems, the tool pulls information from IT environments to perform security checks across an established set of categories — from firewalls to authentication. It then consolidates the evidence to identify gaps or anomalies, without the need for manual work. Ultimately, an automated GRC tool is like a starter kit. It gives organizations a quick compliance snapshot that they can use internally as a guide and to satisfy clients who want a basic level of security assurance. Here’s where it can get confusing: It’s common to assume that these reporting tools provide an official SOC 2 stamp of approval — but that is not the case, by design. Only an independent, official CPA-licensed auditor can attest to SOC 2 compliance. Q: Don’t these out-of-the-box tools make formal reviews easier for SOC 2 auditors? A: Yes and no. Imagine this scenario: A healthtech company that provides software to providers and insurance companies must demonstrate security controls to clients via a SOC 2 report. The company needs to act quickly before it’s time to renew an upcoming contract, so leadership decides to use an out-of-the-box tool that promises to automate the service. When it’s time for the formal report, the company provides an official auditor with access to the tool and its findings. Yes, the auditor gets a handy snapshot of high-level operational controls, with clear indicators to mark areas that need further risk management. But here’s what they can’t see without going far beyond reviewing dashboards and exported reports: Whether the tool was configured correctly across all appropriate systems Whether the evidence is relevant for health industry requirements What rationale or breadcrumbs are leading to the high-level snapshot So, while the automated tools are certainly helpful, the auditor needs a deeper level of information to test the logic and independently attest to SOC 2 compliance. Q: What are some of the specific SOC 2 audit risks in the health industry? A: Anytime that protected health data is involved, compliance is instantly more complex and prone to closer inspection by regulators. Unfortunately, SOC 2 reports that are overly generic or hard to validate most likely will not satisfy the expectations of the Office for Civil Rights (OCR) if they come in for an audit after a data breach. We understand there can be benefits for healthtech companies — especially those in growth mode — to automate the compliance process for efficiency and cost savings. But with the prospect of OCR fines and penalties (not to mention the erosion of client trust and reputation after a breach), it’s not worth sacrificing audit quality for a quick fix . Ultimately, SOC 2 reports need to stand up to the standards set by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA) to avoid scrutiny. And for healthtech companies specifically, a SOC 2 report is often one requirement of many: Customers may require them to layer different security frameworks and reports to demonstrate compliance with HITRUST, HIPAA and more. Q: How does a more individualized SOC 2 audit fill in the gaps? A: GRC tools and other automation-driven audit solutions are often useful to get smaller and midsized organizations into compliance shape (it’s like signing up for your first gym membership). With proper configuration, these tools can help introduce a basic structure for policies and procedures and can monitor IT systems for high-level security gaps. But regulators and educated customers require organizations to demonstrate that security controls are valid and functioning — and there’s no such thing as a carbon-copy data environment. Just like every person needs a unique workout routine to keep them healthy and fit, every company needs a unique security protocol. At Wipfli, we individualize audit services and can also augment automation tools with: Evidence inspection and validation. Customized controls based on your unique environment. Independent AICPA attestation. Most companies recognize that SOC 2 reporting helps satisfy basic customer requirements and qualify for future contracts. But it’s important to remember that these audits are more than a logo on the website or a simple check-the-box activity in a proposal response. For organizations responsible for the protection of sensitive health information, rigorous compliance builds a strong culture of security — with critical controls in place to keep growing with confidence over the long term. Read more: Regulatory shifts bring new strategies for healthtech leaders True or false? An authorized external assessor breaks down 9 common HITRUST certification myths 5 ways healthtech companies use outsourcing to grow
Reach out to our team
Get guidance to build a stronger foundation while keeping your momentum. Our team helps technology companies scale with confidence and stay ready for what’s next.





