Wipfli logo
Insights - Articles, Blogs and on-demand webcasts

Articles & E-Books

 

A trap for the unwary in the CARES Act ‘retail glitch’ fix

Sep 08, 2020

When the CARES Act provided a technical correction for the so-called “retail glitch” in the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, it also created a trap that could cause taxpayers to permanently lose future qualified improvement property (QIP) depreciation deductions.

The fix generally allows taxpayers to immediately deduct up to 100% of the cost of such improvements using bonus depreciation, rather than depreciate them over 39 years.  

Not only can the deduction be taken for improvements made in future years, but the IRS also made it easy for taxpayers to go back and claim the deduction for improvements made in 2018 and 2019.  By filing an amended return or a Form 3115, taxpayers can generate additional deductions and increase their cash-flow.  

But what if a taxpayer doesn’t want to go back and claim the deduction available to them for the prior year? In such cases, can a taxpayer choose to simply keep depreciating QIP placed in service in 2018 and/or 2019 using the 39-year life with no bonus depreciation?  Taxpayers may want to do so for a variety of reasons:

  • To avoid the additional time and expense involved
  • To avoid amending partner or shareholder returns in the case of a flow-through entity 
  • To avoid opening up a previously-filed return to audit or causing an extension of the statute of limitations
  • Perhaps any additional depreciation deductions generated would be not provide an immediate benefit due to the application of another limitation in the tax law such as the passive loss rules

Common sense would say the IRS wouldn’t mind if a taxpayer opted to continue using a 39-year depreciable life with no bonus depreciation, because it is better for the IRS.  Surprisingly, however, there are negative consequences to not adjusting the depreciable life and method of QIP placed in service in 2018 or 2019 to reflect the retroactive changes made in the CARES Act. In such a case, taxpayers risk permanently losing future depreciation deductions with respect to those QIP assets. 

The ‘allowed or allowable’ dilemma

The IRS indicated that using a 39-year depreciable life for QIP placed in service in 2018 and beyond is now considered to be an impermissible depreciation method. In addition, bonus depreciation is mandatory with respect to qualified property unless a taxpayer elects out on the tax return for the year in which the property was placed in service. 

IRS rules require generally that the basis of depreciable property be reduced by the greater of the depreciation ‘allowed or allowable.’ The basis of depreciable property eligible for bonus depreciation must also be reduced by the greater of the bonus amount ‘allowed or allowable’ before any other regular depreciation deductions are computed. 

Because QIP placed in service in 2018 and 2019 was made retroactively eligible for bonus depreciation, unless an election out, taxpayers must reduce the tax basis of such QIP by the amount of “allowable”’ bonus depreciation, whether or not such bonus depreciation was actually claimed. 

That means the basis of any QIP placed in service in 2018 and 2019 is required to be reduced by the amount of bonus depreciation that should have been taken, and future depreciation deductions can’t be claimed with respect to that basis reduction amount going forward. 

Further, in the year of sale, a taxpayer using an impermissible depreciation method would still be required to reduce its tax basis by the amount of depreciation that would have been ‘allowable’ had a permissible method been used. This could create a ‘whip-saw’ situation, since taxpayers would be required to pick up additional gain as if the ‘allowable’ depreciation deductions were claimed but would have never actually received the benefit of those deductions.

That’s why the rules create a trap for the unwary. 

Taxpayers that (a) placed QIP in service in 2018 or 2019, (b) did not elect out of bonus depreciation, and (c) do not file a 3115, amended return, or AAR for such years to either claim bonus depreciation or elect out of bonus depreciation and claim additional depreciation deductions using a shorter depreciable life, will permanently lose the benefit of all future deductions with respect to such QIP. 

Action required by taxpayers with QIP placed in service in 2018 or 2019

To avoid this trap, taxpayers with QIP placed in service in 2018 or 2019, who did not specifically elect out of bonus depreciation and/or used a 39-year life for that QIP should take one of the following actions:

  1. File a 3115, amended return, or AAR for the affected years to claim bonus depreciation on all QIP placed in service during such years. 
  2. File a 3115, amended return, or AAR for the affected years to elect out of bonus depreciation for the 15-year asset class and claim additional depreciation deductions using a 15-year life, rather than a 39-year life. 

Each taxpayer’s unique situation will dictate the best option. Some of the options are limited by time constraints as well, so be sure to contact your Wipfli relationship executive or a member of your Wipfli team to learn more. 

Need help with COVID-19 issues?

We’re here to help you navigate the uncertainty of the COVID-19 pandemic and its impact on your people, finances and business. We have developed a library of resources in our COVID-19 resource center to help you stabilize today and prepare for tomorrow. We also have solutions that can help you manage your people, strategy, operations, business finances and technology. We’re here to help. Contact us today.

See our articles on:

Managing disruption
Your workforce
Financial strategies
Cybersecurity and technology
Working remotely
Legislation, stimulus funding

Author(s)

Brianna N. Komppa, CPA
Senior Manager, Tax
View Profile