Why Wipfli?
Wipfli can help your organization take action with solutions tailored to the unique challenges of home health and hospice agencies.
Our team includes clinical and administrative professionals who’ve spent their entire careers in healthcare, so we understand the pressures your agency faces. We’re ready to help you streamline operations, optimize performance, realize greater revenue, minimize risk and stay in compliance.
From back-office solutions to advisory services, we provide a wide range of support:
Wipfli’s healthcare consulting team can help you achieve your vision of success by changing the way you manage strategy and financial health. We’re ready to support your organization with services including:
- Reimbursement services
- Revenue cycle management
- Capital and facility planning
- Strategic planning
Get the technology strategy and execution guidance you need with Wipfli’s digital services. We offer support for a wide range of technology needs, including:
- Data and analytics
- Cybersecurity
- EHR, ERP and CRM
- Business intelligence solutions
- Cloud computing
Increase the experience and knowledge of your back office with Wipfli’s outsourced services. Our fractional CFO and outsourced accounting can support your organization with financial analysis and planning, as well as support for your day-to-day financial operations. We also provide managed technology and VICSO services to help you enhance your cybersecurity and IT infrastructure.
Wipfli’s industry-experienced team is ready to help you develop a tax plan capable of navigating federal, state and local tax laws while minimizing your exposure.
Wipfli’s organizational performance services can help ensure that your people, operations and strategy stay aligned in achieving your organization’s objectives. Discover how we can support you with strategic planning, process improvement and leadership development.
Wipfli has experience in providing audit and assurance services to a wide range of healthcare entities. We’re ready to help your organization choose the right audit and equip you with the information you need to strengthen compliance and improve operations.
Reach out to our team
Discover how our team can help you balance regulatory demands, operational efficiency and exceptional patient care.
Insights and resources
ARTICLE
Rural hospital strategy: Maximizing value for your entire network
Rural hospitals are often essential access points, major employers and important parts of a regional delivery network. Yet within a large health system, their financial contribution can be easy to overlook because their total revenue may be smaller than that of a single service line at a tertiary hospital. That is the wrong comparison. The better question is whether the rural hospital is being used strategically. Is the system preserving local access, directing the right care to the right setting and taking advantage of the reimbursement structures available to qualifying rural providers? The answer is not to move services to a rural location simply because reimbursement may be different. It is to evaluate patient need, clinical appropriateness, capacity, compliance and system economics together. Why rural hospitals require a different strategy Rural healthcare operates with lower volume, a higher proportion of patients covered by government programs in many markets, longer travel distances and persistent workforce constraints. Rural communities also vary widely. A frontier hospital, a regional rural referral center and a hospital located near a metropolitan area do not face the same market conditions. Specialist access is one of the clearest differences. When patients must travel long distances for routine specialty care, they may delay treatment or rely on the emergency department. A coordinated outreach, rotating-specialist, or telehealth model can keep appropriate care local while connecting the rural hospital to the broader health system. For the health system, that rural location is more than a small hospital. It is existing infrastructure, a trusted community presence and a platform for primary care, diagnostics, outpatient services, emergency care and referrals. The strategic value comes from using that platform well. Three reimbursement structures that matter for rural hospitals Rural status by itself does not create a single reimbursement model. The relevant payment methodology depends on the provider type, program eligibility, ownership structure, services furnished, payer and state rules. Three programs deserve particular attention. 1. Critical Access Hospital reimbursement A CAH is a specific Medicare provider type, not a general term for every rural hospital. Qualifying hospitals must meet federal requirements that include rural location, distance or necessary-provider criteria, a limit of 25 inpatient beds, 24/7 emergency services and an annual average length-of-stay requirement for acute inpatient care. Medicare generally reimburses CAHs for allowable costs under a cost-based methodology. That can be advantageous in a low-volume environment, but it does not automatically make every service profitable. Leaders still need disciplined cost reporting, service-line analysis, charge capture and an understanding of how shared costs are allocated across the system. 2. Rural Health Clinic payment An RHC is a federally certified outpatient clinic located in a rural, underserved area. RHCs may be independent or provider-based, and Medicare generally pays qualifying visits under an all-inclusive-rate methodology, subject to applicable rules and limits. The key point is not that an RHC receives the full amount charged. Payment depends on the clinic’s status, the service, the payer and current payment rules. Health systems should evaluate where RHC certification is available, whether the provider-based structure is appropriate and whether operations, staffing, billing and documentation support compliance. 3. The 340B Drug Pricing Program The 340B program allows eligible covered entities to purchase outpatient drugs at discounted prices. For qualifying rural hospitals, it can support access and financial sustainability, but participation brings significant eligibility, registration, recordkeeping and program-integrity responsibilities. Health systems should treat 340B as a compliance-intensive program, not simply a margin opportunity. The right approach is to confirm eligibility, maintain strong oversight and monitor federal and manufacturer developments that may affect the program. Where the opportunity is for rural hospitals The most durable opportunity is to match local demand with services that can be delivered safely and efficiently in the rural community. That may include primary care, infusion, imaging, rehabilitation, selected outpatient procedures, behavioral health, specialty clinics or other services supported by the market. This requires a system-level view. Moving every patient to the tertiary center can create travel burdens, increase leakage and underuse rural capacity. Moving a service to a rural site solely for reimbursement can create compliance and operational risk. The goal is a clinically sound network in which each location has a clear role. Bring specialty care closer to the patient A rotating-specialist model can expand access without requiring a full-time specialist at every rural location. It also strengthens the connection between local primary care providers and the health system’s specialty network. In many cases, consultation, diagnostics and follow-up can occur locally, while more complex interventions remain at the tertiary center. Done well, this model can reduce avoidable travel, improve continuity and create a more predictable outpatient pathway. It also helps the system reserve higher-acuity capacity for patients who truly need it. Use telehealth as care infrastructure, not a future windfall Telehealth can extend specialty, behavioral health and follow-up care into rural communities, but reimbursement rules remain service- and site-specific and continue to change. Current Medicare rules for RHC and FQHC distant-site medical telehealth do not simply mirror the RHC all-inclusive rate, while mental health telehealth follows different requirements. For that reason, telehealth should be evaluated first as an access and workforce strategy. The business case should reflect the current billing rules, technology costs, clinical workflow, patient connectivity and the value of keeping care within the system. Any future payment improvement should be treated as upside, not the foundation of the investment. What health systems should do now? Start with a practical, location-by-location review: Define the role of each rural hospital and clinic within the regional continuum of care. Analyze service-line demand, contribution margin, capacity, referral patterns and patient out-migration. Validate CAH, RHC, provider-based and 340B eligibility, operations and compliance. Review cost-reporting practices, cost allocation, charge capture, coding, denials and payer performance. Identify services that can be delivered locally based on community need, clinical appropriateness, staffing and infrastructure. Build specialist outreach and telehealth models around access and continuity, using current reimbursement rules in the financial model. Evaluate rural facilities with measures that reflect their mission and strategic role, including access, network retention, quality, workforce and financial sustainability. A rural hospital should not be dismissed because it will never produce the same total revenue as a large urban medical center. Its value is different. It can preserve access, anchor the local care network, support primary and outpatient care and connect patients to the broader health system. The opportunity is not to chase reimbursement. It is to build a disciplined rural strategy that aligns community need, clinical delivery, reimbursement, infrastructure and long-term sustainability. Health systems that do that well can strengthen both their rural facilities and the system as a whole. Read more Rural healthcare RCM: Let data analytics improve your financial performance 5 reimbursement strategies for rural health clinics The tech infrastructure that can drive your rural health transformation
ARTICLE
UDS reporting: Turn compliance into strategic value
For federally qualified health centers (FQHCs), the Uniform Data System (UDS) can be a cumbersome burden — a backward-facing, compliance-driven reporting task that ties up critical assets every year between New Year’s and Valentine’s Day, costing personnel hours and operational efficiency. But for health centers interested in a data-driven future, UDS reporting can present a unique opportunity to modernize and even gain critical insights. A smarter approach to UDS reporting leads to enhanced federal compliance for FQHCs, plus improved behind-the-scenes efficiency and improved patient outcomes. What is UDS reporting in healthcare and how is it used? UDS is an annual reporting system through which FQHCs report their clinical and financial data to federal regulators, enabling authorities to monitor healthcare trends, allocate resources effectively and further data-driven decision-making about community needs. Federal UDS reporting is often contemporaneous with analogous reporting to state agencies, on similar or complimentary benchmarks. UDS data is also used to evaluate the performance of health centers, improve standards of care and identify centers of excellence. By providing insights into disease patterns, treatment costs and patient demographics, UDS serves as a vital tool for managing and tracking critical data from healthcare access points nationwide. Traditionally, UDS data has been used primarily for monitoring purposes, with limited direct consequences for inaccuracies or deviations from the norm. However, the landscape is shifting, and there are now more reasons than ever for FQHCs to insist on accurate data, both from an accountability perspective and because of the potential high value of the insights offered through the data. During the COVID-19 crisis, certain grant awards were directly tied to the total number of patients served, as reported through UDS. This allocation method may continue into the future, underscoring the importance of accurate and comprehensive data reporting for FQHCs seeking to secure vital funding and resources. Today, UDS is commonly used to compare and contrast health centers, particularly along the lines of staffing ratios, quality scores, and financial efficiency. It’s become more common for lenders, funders, and regulators to consult UDS data as a way to benchmark FQHCs against one another. Additionally, savvy Boards of Directors often consult their health center’s public data, monitor year-to-date reporting, and seek to engage executives to understand how (and why) data is trending. The challenges behind meeting the data reporting requirements With a strict reporting deadline of February 15, many FQHCs rush at the beginning of the year to allocate resources to collect the necessary data and organize the reporting. If centers haven’t been checking data quality and outcomes throughout the year, it can make for a stressful Valentine’s Day. To effectively address the challenges associated with UDS reporting, it is crucial to first identify the specific pain points within an FQHC’s data collection and management operations. Common hurdles include: Lack of dedicated resources: Many FQHCs don’t have the resources to dedicate personnel to the UDS reporting process. Often, data entry and reporting responsibilities are assigned to staff members whose training is in other areas, leading to potential oversights or inaccuracies. Data silos and fragmentation: In some cases, data may be scattered across multiple systems or departments within an FQHC, preventing a comprehensive view of the organization’s operations and patient population. Technical complexities: Navigating the intricacies of EHR systems, financial software and the UDS reporting platform itself can pose significant technical challenges in getting systems to generate the correct data sets, particularly for organizations with limited IT resources or expertise. Manual data entry and error-prone processes: Reliance on manual data entry and lack of automated processes is a time-consuming process, tying up valuable resources on tedious work that can also introduce human error, compromising the accuracy and integrity of the reported data. Lack of staff training and engagement: Inadequate training and limited staff engagement can lead to misunderstandings or misinterpretations of data collection and reporting requirements, resulting in inaccurate submissions that don’t capture the full quality of an FQHC’s services. Changing requirements: UDS regulations change every year, meaning FQHCs need to annually invest additional resources into keeping up with the latest updates. Identifying these pain points can help FQHCs develop targeted strategies and leverage available resources to address the specific challenges they face, paving the way for more efficient and accurate UDS reporting and a greater benefit for the FQHCs themselves. Building a more effective UDS reporting process How can FQHCs ease the burden of UDS reporting? And what modifications can be put into place to turn the onerous process of data collection and management into a source of added value for the organization? FQHCs can simplify the UDS reporting process and position themselves for success in an increasingly data-driven marketplace by focusing on five critical areas for improvement: Creating a data governance committee: Establish a cross-functional data governance committee that brings together stakeholders from various departments, including clinical, operational, financial and quality teams. This committee should be responsible for overseeing how data is coded, collected and managed, identifying areas for improvement and driving organizational alignment. Technical enhancementsto the system: Conduct a comprehensive analysis of data workflows and map the journey of data from its point of capture to its ultimate destination within the reporting systems. This exercise can help identify system limitations, bottlenecks, redundancies and opportunities to streamline processes. Monthly data analysis: Pull and discuss data every month in order to identify issues and squash them early. Data can be compared against prior-year trends and, in the case of variance, can be tracked and analyzed to determine why the variance is occurring. It’s much easier to proactively address issues than to try troubleshooting late in the year with the February 15 deadline fast approaching. Data quality audits: Implement regular data quality audits to validate the accuracy and completeness of the data being collected and reported. These audits can involve sampling techniques, cross-referencing multiple data sources and leveraging data analytics tools to identify discrepancies or anomalies. Staff training and engagement: Invest in ongoing staff training and engagement initiatives to ensure that all stakeholders understand the importance of accurate data collection and reporting. Additionally, by identifying early in the process who is responsible for what, more tasks can be managed in a timely fashion, and everyone will be working from the same playbook from the start. By addressing these key issues, organizations can begin to transform their once-dreaded UDS workload into a valuable chance for growth and operational improvement. Use UDS data reporting to spark growth Follow these steps so your FQHC can successfully harness data to its strategic advantage. Make UDS a monthly priority by reviewing it regularly with leadership and the board. Include UDS in routine reporting alongside financial and clinical metrics. Benchmark against peers to identify unusual trends or potential issues. Compare UDS data to internal reports and clinician insights to uncover discrepancies. Establish clear data governance by defining a source of truth for different needs across competing systems such as UDS, EHR, payroll, accounting and Population Health System. Treat UDS as an ongoing process rather than a once-a-year burden to drive operational improvements, efficiency and growth opportunities. Turning UDS reporting into value UDS can provide more than just peace of mind for your organization. By shifting to a value-producing approach rather than a compliance-only focus, your organization can derive significant benefits from the annual exercise. Automating and integrating data to improve operational efficiency Manually pulling data together is a time-intensive process that ties up key resources just to meet regulatory deadlines. But shifting to an automated data collection system and implementing integration tools that can pull data from all of your systems can minimize data handling while improving accuracy. This provides value by reducing preparation time and staff costs , while also freeing up resources to focus on patient care or operational improvements. Additionally, real-time access to your data can be used to monitor performance on an ongoing basis, not just during UDS prep time. Turning UDS preparation into a continuous quality improvement cycle UDS preparation at many health centers is reactive, with efforts focused merely on submitting a complete product or on avoiding UDS quality-control questions in a rush to get the process done. But by using the process as a catalyst for ongoing quality improvement, you can have regular visibility into actionable data to monitor improvement in clinical care, financial reporting and operational processes, leading to better outcomes for your organization. Using UDS data to enhance patient care with higher-quality reporting Your data can help create actionable insights that can improve the quality of the care you provide. Your preparations already include reporting on standard clinical quality measures, which matter to funders, your community and — most of all — your patients. UDS provides a valuable opportunity for leadership to monitor these quality measures on an ongoing basis and take steps to improve them before undesirable trends become entrenched. Don’t just consider these isolated reporting activities — this data can be used to make real-time decisions. Improving quality metrics is often tied to reimbursement under value-based care models, and may generate quality incentive payments from payers, so your bottom line benefits as well. Improving staff efficiency and engagement through process standardization UDS preparation can overburden staff, leading to burnout, inefficiency and potential reporting errors. But a standardized process with streamlined workflows for data collection, review and submission can help ensure smoother operations, reduced redundancy and less stressed-out staff. Involve clinical staff in audit readiness programs so they can grasp the link between checking boxes in the EHR, day-to-day care delivery and quality metrics that are ultimately reported publicly. This also leads to a more proactive quality-first culture, decreasing the need for a last-minute scramble to gather and process relevant data come February. Ultimately, UDS offers your health center a wealth of opportunities. It’s up to your organization to determine what that might mean for your operations. How much of a role UDS plays in your day-to-day may differ among organizations, but whatever your desired level of involvement is, it’s important to choose a vision, document it and work toward implementation. Read more 4 workforce strategies for FQHC financial health Improving rural healthcare RCM with data analytics The tech infrastructure that can drive your rural health transformation
ARTICLE
Six benefits of data and analytics for senior living facilities
In the current market, the senior living industry is grappling with a variety of competing challenges. Critical financial, operational and strategic issues demand significant attention and resources. Additionally, while technology solutions have produced an abundance of data, actionable insights are still lacking. Data and analytics are possible solutions that can help senior living facilities overcome these challenges. Organizations can use data analysis to turn financial, organizational and residential data into actionable insights that lead to more confident decisions about investments, growth and resident care. But where to start? The potential use cases for data are vast, so it’s helpful to focus on scenarios that can quickly generate large value. Below are six instances where senior living facilities can see benefits from leveraging data and analytics: 1. Financial and operational transparency The majority of senior living organizations have reporting in the areas of finance and operations, but often these reporting processes are highly manual, Excel-based and time-consuming. Modern data and analytics solutions allow for automation and optimization of these processes, which provides more time for analyzing and acting on the insights as opposed to manipulating the data. The result is higher quality and better capabilities for the facility. Intuitive dashboards can make key financial and operational metrics more readily available across an organization. They allow leaders to dynamically drill into their respective areas in near real time and directly impact metrics in a valuable way, rather than relying on the rearview mirror. Accessibility to core financial and operational metrics allows organizations to be nimble and is critical to remaining resilient in the current market. This helps diminish the risk of turnover within an organization, as well as provide information readily for quick and educated decision-making. 2. Expansion decisions Growth decisions in senior living carry significant financial and operational risk. Whether considering a new location, adding a service line or increasing capacity at an existing site, leaders need to make data-driven decisions. Data and analytics give organizations a structured framework for evaluating expansion opportunities before capital is committed. By analyzing performance across locations and service lines, leadership can quickly identify which areas are generating strong returns and which are underperforming. This prevents organizations from scaling what isn’t working and enables focused investment where the greatest opportunity exists. Key capabilities that can drive smarter expansion decisions include: Performance benchmarking across services and locations: Compare revenue, occupancy and margin across sites to identify which models are most scalable and replicable. ROI measurement: Quantify the financial return of existing investments to build a defensible business case for future expansion and prioritize the highest-value opportunities. Capacity utilization analysis: Understand how effectively current space and resources are being used, revealing whether demand exists to justify growth or whether optimization is needed first. Identifying operational bottlenecks: Uncover workflow, staffing or care delivery constraints that could be magnified at scale, allowing organizations to resolve inefficiencies before they impact a new or expanded operation. When expansion decisions are grounded in data rather than assumptions, organizations reduce downside risk, improve stakeholder alignment and increase the likelihood that growth translates into sustainable, long-term value. 3. Quality of care Use of data analytics tools enables senior living facilities to monitor their standards of care. These tools allow analysis of valuable information such as: The percentage of short-stay residents who showed improved mobility over a specific time period. Year-over-year changes in the number of long-stay residents who have fallen. Change in the number of short-term patients requiring outpatient emergency department visits. Annual reporting metrics. These data and analytics tools also allow easier access to data that is helpful when meeting government regulations or applying for federal or state grants. Having this information on demand enables organizations to constantly assess performance and identify areas for improvement, enhancing the safety and experience for residents. 4. Staffing and retention With current staffing challenges throughout the healthcare industry, finding talent is extremely difficult, which makes retention a higher priority than ever. Predictive analytics can play a key role in retaining staff as well as optimizing staff scheduling. Regarding retention, predictive models can be deployed to help determine a flight risk for staff. This type of proactive identification can help managers implement retention strategies and diminish overall risk. Improved transparency, real-time data and predictive analytics can also support enhanced forecasting and planning for staffing. Enhancing existing staffing processes with these data and analytics capabilities can help improve accuracy, support growing resident volumes and decrease costs for supplemental labor and overtime. 5. Marketing and growth: Attracting new residents Effective marketing is a great way to maximize the inflow of new residents into your facility. Understanding your resident profile will provide you with valuable insights to pinpoint where your current residents are coming from and where you should target your marketing efforts. By tracking and creating visualizations of your current marketing endeavors, you can: See exact ROI by specific campaigns and trends across locations or campaign type. Determine location voids in previous campaigns. Better understand correlations between new residents and campaign successes. Identify previously untapped opportunities. Both aggregate-level and detailed-level information are beneficial for understanding and attracting residents to your organization. Common data analytics tools allow users to easily navigate between these high and low levels of detail for powerful business discovery. Additionally, geoanalytics (enhanced mapping) capabilities in data and analytics offerings can maximize insights for organizations in this area. 6. Experience, surveys and feedback While employee, patient and family satisfaction surveys and feedback platforms are commonly used, organizations can find it difficult to aggregate and process the data these platforms produce. Data and analytics tools allow this data to be organized effectively, demonstrating value by delivering actionable insights. Understanding these insights, both positive and negative, allows organizations to market to strengths and improve deficiencies. Data and analytics solutions help improve the timeliness and accessibility of feedback, which supports quick and impactful changes for an organization. Read more AI in senior living: How organizations can use AI to scale smarter How independent life plan communities can thrive while maintaining their independence Senior living providers are missing out on valuable revenue opportunities. Here’s how to change that.
LET'S CONNECT
Discover how our experienced healthcare advisors can help you strengthen financial performance and prepare for the future of care delivery.
